In
the late 1990s, I was on a group hike that nearly ended in disaster.
About a dozen of us were above tree line on a mountain just as a
thunderstorm threatened to move in. Our goal was to reach a small
lake near the top, but the thunderstorm made it too dangerous to
continue. A handful of people insisted on going anyway. Since it was
an organized hike, the entire group needed to return to the trailhead
together, so the rest of us waited at an abandoned mine so the others
could find us when they returned from the lake.
We
hunkered down in what little cover we could find just as the
thunderstorm moved over us and began dumping torrents of rain. In the
distance, we saw a couple of people become trapped on a rock face,
and we were soon joined by a larger group of hikers who were less
prepared than we were. We assisted the newcomers and debated just how
safe we really were. The storm was bigger than we hoped, and it
became clear to most of us that the risk of staying was too great.
During a brief lull in the rain, we and the newcomers made a dash for
the trees. Luckily, the rest of our group had made the same decision,
abandoning their trip to the lake, and joined us at tree line. After
hiking down the mountain as fast as possible, we encountered
emergency vehicles waiting for the hikers we had seen on rock face.
I
was reminded of this story recently as more bad news came in about
humanity's sabotage of natural systems. Honeybees, critical to the
survival of plants, are losing
habitat because of climate change. Meanwhile, scientists have
documented a mass
die-off of seabirds that suggests serious problems with ocean
ecosystems. Catastrophic seal level rise may
now be inevitable, again due to climate change; and a new
study indicates that we humans are critically reducing the
collection and availability of energy necessary for ecosystems –
and us – to function.
Like
hikers determined to get as far above tree line as possible, we have
defined "progress" as distance from Nature. We have done
the equivalent of cutting down trees to fuel our ascent, altering the
weather in the process and spawning the thunderstorm that threatens
to maroon us, and then kill us. Heading back down the mountain is
perceived as an act of cowardice, giving up on our dreams; so some
people go ahead, while others compromise by waiting in the brush just
above tree line until they come to their senses. Meanwhile, the risk
is growing that lightning will cause the remaining trees to burn,
cutting off escape, and that the thunderstorm will grow and last a
very long time.
We
can do the equivalent of retreating below tree line, and try to grow
as many trees back as possible to reduce the risk; we could hunker
down and hope the storm passes; or we could follow our original plan
and keep going up. The option you choose depends on what you value;
and if you value people's lives above arbitrary personal attainment,
then the choice is obvious.
No comments:
Post a Comment