Yesterday,
the president of the United States issued what was, in effect, a
formal declaration of war against life on Earth. In a speech based
more on ideology than reality, he firmly placed the economic
growth of the United States based on fossil fuels as a higher
priority than trying to limit the high risk of extinction imposed by
one of the most destructive consequences of using those fuels: global
climate change.
Substantively,
it wasn't a surprise. By word and deed, economic dominance over the
world has been the primary goal of the president and his supporters,
as a natural consequence of placing one group as "first"
and insisting on increase of exponential growth by that group. The
main topic of debate has been more around who is really in the group
than what its goals are.
Dominance
of one group over one or more others without their consent falls
within any reasonable definition of "war." Humans have been
waging war on other species for millennia, and by now have
essentially won. Those who prefer domination over other people have
been waging the more familiar kind of war for just as long, but on
average have been kept from lowering the overall population by
accessing more resources; but now that critical resources are
becoming scarce on a global basis, that is about to change.
Those
of us preferring coexistence tend to value life over personal power,
and have attempted to delay that change for as long as possible. This
has been done through development of agreements like the Paris accord
and the development of new technologies to get more utility out of
remaining resources without causing more damage in the process.
Climate change has achieved its current priority due its potential,
now actualizing, to reduce resources faster than we are consuming
them, taking control out of our hands and forcing competition into
primacy – with inevitable, deadly effect.
For
several years I have had a creeping feeling of dread, like others
whose opinions I have read and discussed personally. This has come
from study, analysis, and experience in my own environment as the
evidence of growing damage to the world has become pervasive. For
some reason I can't yet fathom, the president's decision to openly
step away from global cooperation to deal with climate change, even
in a largely symbolic way, has amplified that feeling to the point of
alternating depression and rage. Dealing with that remains the focus
of my creative writing, and is fueling my personal drive to resist in
every way that matches my values as the environmental and social crap
storm that is now defining our lives continues to grow in intensity.
No comments:
Post a Comment