Last
week I experienced an epiphany while taking a much-needed break at a
local park. It involved one of the key insights from my research into
world population and consumption, namely the equivalence of life
satisfaction, "happiness," with how much of Nature we
inhabit (what I've called "environments").
There
is a theoretical maximum to happiness, reached when the average
person consumes all of the renewable products and services
("resources") produced by Earth's biosphere, and we are now
at a value below that number, apparently unable to move it any
higher. I have struggled with the question of "why" many
times since I first discovered it, and on that day I felt like I was
beginning to see the answer.
I
have yet to find a precise mechanism that explains my insight into
happiness and environments; it is presently a compelling hypothesis
that seems to have a lot of explanatory power. If such a mechanism
exists, it is likely biological, and has an effect on the way we
think and experience the world. I have already speculated that it may
behind the observed psychopathic behavior of the rich, whose
happiness (based on my research into the economic implications) is
near or beyond the maximum. My new insight came from asking the
following question: What if there are thresholds below that value
that also trigger marked changes in behavior?
It
is perhaps not coincidental that our present average happiness is
pegged at a value equal to the square of the maximum. That value may
be the "trigger" signaling that we are consuming all of the
resources available on this planet without having fatal
degradation of its habitability. I recalled that ecologists have
determined that the other species which provide most of those
resources need about 20% of the total to survive, a number close to
the difference between maximum allowable happiness and total
happiness (100% minus 82%), and we are now consuming about twice as
much as we are allowed by that standard of safety. A reasonable
consequence of such a trigger would be restraint on our consumption,
and we seem to have been responding that way since 2011.
What
about other potential triggers? A century ago, the world's average
happiness was the cube of the maximum. Like now, it was a period of
huge economic inequality, and of course it was followed by the Great
Depression and was marked by immense global conflict. The fourth
power of maximum happiness was experienced sometime near the middle of
the first millennium A.D., which corresponds to the
peak and fall of the Roman Empire. These associations may be
coincidental, but they are also intriguing and suggest that further
investigation may be fruitful.
1 comment:
As revealed in later posts, this experience culminated in what I now call the "Half-Earth Hypothesis." See my research site (http://bigpicexplorer.com) for details.
Post a Comment